ENUMA ELISH

The Babylonian Epic of Creation 

Edited by Johannes Haubold, Sophus Helle, Enrique Jiménez, and Selena Wisnom

Transcription by Adrian C. Heinrich and  translation by Sophus Helle

https://oa-fund.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/1536/1/b-9781350297425.pdf

BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC 

Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland 

BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 

First published in Great Britain 2025 Copyright © Johannes Haubold, Sophus Helle, Enrique Jiménez,  Selena Wisnom and contributors, 2025 Johannes Haubold, Sophus Helle, Enrique Jiménez and Selena Wisnom have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Author of this work. 

For legal purposes the Acknowledgments on p. xi constitute an extension of this copyright page. Series Design: Stefan Killen  Cover image: Deep blue Lapis lazuli rock (c) Damian Pawlos/istock 

This work is published open access subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 

You may re-use, distribute, and reproduce this work in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 

Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third-party websites referred to or in this book. 

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: HB: 978-1-3502-9716-6 PB: 978-1-3502-9719-7 ePDF: 978-1-3502-9717-3 eBook: 978-1-3502-9718-0 Series: The Library of Babylonian Literature

CONTRIBUTORS 

Céline Debourse is Assistant Professor in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Harvard University, USA. She is an Assyriologist specializing in the languages, history, and religion of Babylonia during the first millennium bce, with a focus on the final centuries of cuneiform culture. Her work draws on a broad spectrum of methods and disciplines, from rigorous philological analysis, through historical criticism and literary studies, to the application of sociological and anthropological theories. She furthermore aims to embed Babylonia in wider Near Eastern history and to foster dialogues between Assyriology and other disciplines. 

Eckart Frahm is Professor of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Yale University, USA. His research interests focus on Assyrian and Babylonian history, cuneiform scholarly texts, and the connections between literature, religion, and politics in ancient Mesopotamia and Israel. Frahm is the (co-)author or (co-)editor of nine books, among them, most recently, Assyria: The Rise and Fall of the World’s First Empire (2023). He is the director of the Cuneiform Commentaries Project (http://ccp.yale.edu) and has served as an expert witness in a number of high-profile cases of trafficking in cultural artefacts from the Middle East. 

Gösta Gabriel is an Assyriologist and head of an independent junior research group (Emmy Noether-Gruppe) at the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. His research focuses on mythological narratives (in literary and other sources) and the ways in which they convey ancient ideas and discourses. He has worked intensively on Enuma Elish (a monograph was published in 2014, followed by several articles). More recently, he has been working on the Sumerian King List and is preparing a book on the early tradition of the hero Gilgamesh and the ways in which this figure had been shaped and repeatedly reinterpreted. 

Johannes Haubold is Professor of Classics at Princeton University, USA. He has published widely on contact and exchange between the literatures of ancient Greece and Mesopotamia (e.g. Greece and Mesopotamia: Dialogues in Literature, 2013); and on the Chaldean movement and its roots in Babylonian celestial scholarship (e.g. ed., with John Steele and Kathryn Stevens, Keeping Watch in Babylon: The Astronomical Diaries in Context, 2019). 

Sophus Helle is a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, USA. He holds a PhD in Comparative Literature from Aarhus University and has translated the Babylonian epic Gilgamesh (2021) and the Sumerian poems attributed to Enheduana (2023), accompanying both translations with in-depth studies of the texts. He has published on the recurrent narrative structures, poetic forms, authorship, gender and sexuality, and modern reception of cuneiform poetry. He is also a freelance correspondent for the Danish newspaper Weekendavisen, writing on premodern literature and history more broadly. 

Enrique Jiménez is Chair of Ancient Near Eastern Literatures at LMU, Germany, and the winner of a 2017 Sofja Kovalevskaja Award. He specializes in the literature and scholarly texts from ancient Mesopotamia, in particular from the first millennium bce. He is PI of the electronic Babylonian Literature platform (http://www.ebl.lmu.de/). 

Gina Konstantopoulos is Assistant Professor in Assyriology and Cuneiform Studies in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures at the University of California Los Angeles, USA. She works on religion and magic in Mesopotamia, Sumerian and Akkadian literature, and the modern reception of the ancient Near East. Her publications include The Divine/Demonic Seven and the Places of Demons in Mesopotamia (2023) and the co-edited volume The Shape of Stores (2023). She has previously held research positions at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, the University of Helsinki, and the University of Tsukuba. 

Piotr Michalowski is George G. Cameron Professor Emeritus of Ancient Mesopotamian Civilizations at the University of Michigan, USA. He studied at the University of Warsaw and at Yale University (PhD 1976). His research interests focus on many aspects of the cultures of Mesopotamia, including languages, linguistics, literatures, poetics, mythology, history, historiography, politics, pedagogy, as well as music and urbanism. 

Frances Reynolds is Shillito Fellow and Associate Professor of Assyriology in the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Oxford, UK. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at The Queen’s College, University of Oxford. Her broad research area is the intellectual history, literature and religion of Mesopotamia in the first millennium bce. Her second book, A Babylon Calendar Treatise: Scholars and Invaders in the Late First Millennium BC (2019), reflects her focus on Babylon and Marduk’s Esagil temple. Through research, graduate supervision and teaching, she seeks to understand texts in their ancient settings. 

Francesca Rochberg is Catherine and William L. Magistretti Distinguished Professor of Near Eastern Studies Emerita in the Department of Middle Eastern Languages and Cultures at the University of California, Berkeley, USA. She is the author of the recent monographs Before Nature: Cuneiform Knowledge and the History of Science (2016) and Worldmaking and Cuneiform Antiquity: An Anthropology of Science (forthcoming). 

Karen Sonik is a cultural historian specializing in the ancient Near East. She is the author of numerous works on Sumerian and Akkadian narratives and editor of The Routledge Handbook of Emotions in the Ancient Near East (with U. Steinert, 2023); Artifacts and ArtWorks in the Ancient World (2021), Journey to the City: A Companion to the Middle East Galleries at the Penn Museum (with S. Tinney; 2019), The Materiality of Divine Agency (with B. Pongratz-Leisten; 2015), and Contemporary Approaches to Mesopotamian Literature: How to Tell a Story (with D. Shehata; Brill, forthcoming). 

Marc Van De Mieroop is Miriam Champion Professor of History at Columbia University, USA, and director of its Center for the Ancient Mediterranean. He has published numerous books and articles on various aspects of ancient Near Eastern history, Egyptian history and World History with interests ranging from socio-economic and political history to intellectual history. He has also written extensively on historical methodology as it applies to his field of study. His most recent books, Philosophy before the Greeks: The Pursuit of Truth in Ancient Babylonia (Princeton University Press, 2015) and Before and After Babel: Writing as Resistance in Ancient Near Eastern Empires (Oxford University Press, 2023), investigate the underlying principles of Babylonian hermeneutics and their relationship to the various writing systems of the ancient Near Eastern world. He has received various fellowships including from the Guggenheim Foundation, the ACLS, the NEH, and the Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschaften in Vienna. 

Selena Wisnom is Lecturer in the Heritage of the Middle East at the University of Leicester, UK. She is a specialist in the literary and cultural interpretation of cuneiform sources, particularly literature, poetics and intellectual history. As a playwright she has written three plays set in ancient Assyria, and adapts Babylonian verse forms for poetry in English. Her book Weapons of Words: Intertextual Competition in Babylonian Poetry was published in 2020, and The Library of Ancient Wisdom is forthcoming with Penguin and University of Chicago Press.

  / / / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

 E N U M A    E L I S H

Tablet I 

(p.26)

enūma eliš lā nabû šamāmū šapliš ammatu šuma lā zakrat apsûm-(ma) rēštû zārûšun mummu tiāmtu mu’allidat gimrīšun mûšunu ištēniš iḫiqqū-ma gipāra lā kiṣṣurū ṣuṣâ lā šē’ū enūma ilū lā šūpû manāma šuma lā zukkurū šīmāti lā šīmū ibbanû-ma ilū qerebšun laḫmu (u) laḫāmu uštāpû šuma izzakrū adi irbû išīḫū anšar (u) kišar ibbanû-(ma) elīšunu atrū urrikū ūmī uṣṣibū šanāti ānu apilšunu šānin abbīšu anšar ānu bukrašu umaššil-ma u ānu tamšīlašu ulid nudimmud nudimmud ša abbīšu šālissunu šū-ma palkâ uznī ḫasis emūqīn puggul guššur ma’diš ana ālid abīšu anšar lā īši šānina ina ilī atḫêšu innendū-ma atḫû ilū anu[k]kū ešû tiāmtam-ma naṣīršunu ištappu dalḫūnim-ma ša tiāmti karassa ina šu’āri šūdurū qereb andurunna lā našir apsû rigimšun u tiāmtu šuqammumat ina maḫrīšun imtarṣam-ma epšetašun elīšun lā ṭābat alkassunu šunūti …

Tablet I 

(p.27)

When heaven on high had not been named¹ and the ground below was not given a name, primordial Apsû, who fathered them, and the creative force² Tiamat, who gave birth to them all, were mingling together their waters: they had not yet bound meadows or lined the reedbeds.³ 

When none of the gods had been brought forth, had not been given names and had not decreed destinies, then were the gods created within them. Lahmu and Lahamu were brought forth and called by name. 

When they had grown big, grown tall, Anshar and Kishar were created, greater than them. They lengthened their days, expanded their years. Anu, their firstborn, rivalled his fathers.⁴ 

Anshar made Anu, his child, like him,⁵ and Anu gave birth to his likeness in turn – Nudimmud.⁶ Nudimmud: he was the leader among his fathers, vast of mind, perceptive, massive in strength, much mightier than Anshar, who had fathered his father, he had no rival among the gods his brothers. 

They joined together, the brothers, the gods,⁷ and confused Tiamat as their clamour kept growing, troubling Tiamat’s belly,⁸ and with their games spreading grief in Andurunna.⁹ Apsû did not still their noise, and Tiamat was silent before them: their doings disturbed her, their ways were not pleasant, but …¹⁰ 

_____________________________________________

¹ The first nine lines of the poem are among the most discussed passages of Akkadian literature, and the syntax of the text allows for different interpretations. See Sophus Helle and Piotr Michalowski in this volume.

² Akk. mummu, which is later used as a name for Apsû’s servant. 

³ Southern Iraq consisted of a checkerboard of canals and fields: without land or the reed-covered banks, the water was able to mix freely; see Buccellati (1990: 125). On the grammar and the other possible translations of this line, see Haubold (2017: 221–8). 

⁴ Here and throughout the text, the word abu ‘father’ is also used to mean ‘ancestor’. 

⁵ Or: ‘Anu, his child, became like Anshar’. 

⁶ A learned name for the god Ea. 

⁷ Babylonian recension adds: ‘the Anunnaki’. 

⁸ The word karšu means ‘mind’ as well as ‘belly’, so the disturbance can be both physical and mental. Tiamat’s belly is here the watery expanse where the gods live. 

⁹ A cosmological location of uncertain nature. Its use in this context is partly motivated by a pun on the preceding word šūdurū, ‘spreading grief’. 

¹⁰ The widely accepted reading igammela, ‘she was lenient’, seems less likely in light of recent manuscripts; see Fadhil and Jiménez (2021: 216).

(will continue...)

ANTOINE BECHAMP vs LOUIS PASTEUR

THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT VIRUSES & OTHER MICROORGANISMS:

Many people have heard the heartbreaking story about Nikola Tesla, and how Thomas Edison stole his work and caused him to go bankrupt. All the while Tesla has been pretty much erased from History Books...

But how many people know about Antoine Bechamp, and the massive fraud of a man that was Louis Pasteur? Not many I'd bet, as Bechamp was too erased from history. The reason behind this is actually much more sinister then one can imagine. 

During his lifetime, Antoine Bechamp (1816-1908) was a well-known and widely respected professor, teacher, and researcher. He was an active member of the French Academy of Sciences, and gave many presentations there during his long career. He also published many papers, all of which still exist and are available.

And yet, he has disappeared from history.

On the other hand, Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) is one of the great rock stars of medicine and biology. Of the two – Bechamp or Pasteur – he’s the one you’ve most likely heard of. His is one of the most recognizable names in modern science. Many discoveries and advances in medicine and microbiology are attributed to him, including vaccination and the centrepiece of his science – the germ theory of disease.

Louis Pasteur was actually a liar, a coward and a fraud.  Pasteur renounced his own theory on his death bed.

Germ Theory was all wrong: "It’s the terrain, not the germ." quoted Louis Pasteur on his death bed...

It’s not the bacteria or the viruses themselves that produce the disease, it’s the chemical by-products and constituents of these microorganisms enacting upon the unbalanced, malfunctioning cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce disease. If the body’s cellular metabolism and pH is perfectly balanced or poised, it is susceptible to no illness or disease.

So in other words, disease associated microorganisms do not originally produce a disease condition any more than a vulture produces a dead rabbit or rats produce garbage.

The diseased acidic cellular environment was created by a toxic diet, toxic environmental exposures and a toxic lifestyle supporting the morbid changes of germs to bacteria, bacteria to viruses, viruses to fungal forms and fungal forms to cancer cells in the body. This classical error of referring to symptoms as the disease is perpetrated to this day in all medical schools trickled down from the professors (whose bread is buttered by the pharmaceutical industry), to all med students with the intent of brainwashing the young, up and coming physicians to a kill mode mind-set and to be legal script writers and butchers who perform unnecessary surgical procedures.

The reason why all physicians are kept in the dark by medical schools teaching Pasteur’s germ theory is that if they are taught the truth that it’s the inner condition of the patient (i.e. oxygen depravation, nutritional deficiencies, acidic pH, built up toxins in and around the cells, poor circulation, toxic emotions, etc.), not the germs that creates the growth medium for bacteria, viruses, parasites or cancer cell growth, the majority of doctors would throw away their script pad and surgical knife and focus their treatment protocols on reestablishing a healthy cellular environment, which keeps the germs, bacteria and viruses in check.

By killing the viruses, bacteria or cancer cells with their destructive weapons of war, they trigger microzyma evolution that makes the enemy pathogens stronger by creating resistant strains reaping more disease in the future. Nobody correlates their newly formed disease a year later with the past drug therapy. The result if the truth was told, a multi-billion dollar sick care industry that has been meticulously built by the global elite for a century would be exposed and crumble like the Babylonian empire of old. There is no medical doctrine so potentially dangerous as a partial truth implemented as whole truth.

Because of political reasons, Antoine Bechamp’s name and research findings along with the germ theory controversy have been omitted from history, medical and biological books, even encyclopedias. It seems that the historical scientific assassination of Antoine Bechamp resulted in medical science’s monopolization of pharmaceuticals and vaccine research. This has meant untold misery for the human race. It’s ironic that Pasteur himself was reported to have admitted on his deathbed that Claude Bernard was right — the microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything, but would never give credit for Bechamp’s discoveries. Bechamp’s discovery in his early research, that all living things contain tiny granules, which he named microzyma’s, was the most profound discovery of the 20th century.

Microzyma’s Can Trigger Either Life Or Death

Microzyma’s (meaning small ferments), inhabits cells, blood and lymph fluid. They act as both the builder and recycler of organisms. They inhabit cells, the fluid between cells, the blood and the lymph. In the state of healthy terrain. microzyma’s act harmoniously and fermentation occurs normally and beneficially making healthy aerobic microbes like acidophilus and bifidus.

Under diseased pathological internal conditions (low oxygen, malnutrition, acidic pH, poor circulation, etc.), microzyma’s can change the faces of microbes like a chameleon. This is called pleomorphism. Pleo means many and morph means form. So pleomorphism means to change to many forms. These pathogens can either evolve or devolve depending on the surrounding conditions of the cell. The answer in disease processes lies in the condition of your cellular balance or will it support the development of unwanted guests?

In the early stages of acidic pH in the body’s tissues, the warning symptoms are mild. These include such things as skin eruptions, headaches, allergies, colds, flu and sinus problems. These symptoms are frequently treated (manipulated) with antibiotic drugs and suppressive medications. With continued suppression of the warning signals of an acidic and nutrient deficient environment, more serious symptoms arise with the disease driven deeper. Weakened organs and systems start to give way (heart, lung, thyroid, adrenals, the liver, kidneys, etc.).

Unfortunately, symptom manipulation with pharmacology creates a magical shell game of switching diseases, creating more serious symptoms and disease conditions in the future that are totally different from the original disease. The quick fix drug game of voodoo medicine is what’s causing the disease epidemic in this country and puts hospitals and doctors as the number three killer in the U.S.

So what is modem medicine doing with their destructive weapons of war? You can’t kill microzymas, they’re indestructible. You can only trigger a morbid evolution of anaerobic pathogens to molds, fungus, yeast and cancer. It’s the microzymas that are responsible for the decomposition of a dead body back to the soil and creating life to the soil for future plant growth.

Microzymas are an indestructible living entity that cannot be destroyed by heat, antibiotics, or any other weapon of war. My view is that the toxins (acids) from the microforms combine to provoke the body to produce symptoms of a healing crisis to purge or eliminate the toxic residues from the nose through a runny nose, the skin through sweat, the colon through diarrhea, and increased respiration. So it’s important to remember, it is not the pathogens themselves which initiate disease, they only show up because of an acidic, compromised, cell terrain. Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but they don’t cause the swamp to become stagnant.

All Disease Is Acid Related:

In general, degenerative diseases are the result of acid waste build-up within weak cells and organs that are too weak to clean house. When we are born, we have the highest alkaline mineral concentration, establishing the highest pH. That is why most degenerative diseases do not occur when you are young. They occur usually after 40 years of age.

The underlying causes of cancer, heart disease, arteriosclerosis, high blood pressure, diabetes, arthritis, gout, kidney disease, asthma, allergies, psoriasis and other skin disorders, indigestion, diarrhea, nausea, obesity, tooth and gum diseases, osteoporosis, morning sickness, eye diseases, etc., are the accumulation of acids in tissues and cells, poor blood and lymph circulation, and poor cell activity due to toxic acidic residues accumulating around the cell membrane which prevent nutritional elements from entering the cell.

All scavengers breed like parasites. After food is digested and absorbed into the bloodstream it is carried to all 75 trillion cells of the body via the circulatory system. The body eliminates what it can and the remainder settles in the weakest cells. Those which are not strong enough to clean house. In this accumulating, deposited, dead waste matter and pustulant soup, germs like bacteria, viruses, fungus and parasites breed. Rotting takes place and pus (which is decomposed blood), parasites, flukes, tapeworms, hardened mucous and other acid waste products form. 

This, science calls disease:

And the name of the particular disease depends upon the location of the deposits of this acidic, toxic, pustulant soup. If the accumulating deposits are in the joints it’s called arthritis. If the poisonous waste matter accumulates in the pancreas and saturates the beta cells that synthesize insulin it’s called diabetes. If the toxic sludge is dumped in the lungs it’s called chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It’s the same disease. Wherever your weakest link in the chain of organs is, that’s where your genetic disposition for disease will be.

If the overload is too great for the blood, excess acid is dumped into the tissues and cells for storage. Then the lymphatic system and immune system must neutralize what it can and attempt to discard the toxic waste. If the lymphatic system is overloaded generally due to a lack of exercise, acid deposits will suffocate the cells and damage DNA. If the lymphatic system is pumping through exercise and circulation, they will pick up the acid wastes and neutralize them through the kidneys. Unfortunately, they must dump them right back into the blood stream. This will force the blood to attempt to gather more alkaline salts in order to compensate while stressing the liver and kidneys. This robs Peter to pay Paul.

Body Electric:

A healthy condition depends upon a high level of electromagnetic negative charge on the surfaces of tissue cells. Acidity is the opposite charge and dampens out these electrical fields. If tissue pH deviates too far to the acid side, cellular metabolism will cease and oxygen deprivation will occur. Acidity and lack of oxygen are the ideal environmental condition for morbid microforms to flourish. These are the primary symptoms of disease. So in short, acute or recurrent illnesses and infections are either the attempt by the body to mobilize mineral reserves from all parts of the body, or crisis attempts at detoxification. For example, the body may throw off acids through the skin, producing symptoms such as eczema, dermatitis, acne, or other skin disorders. Chronic symptoms result when all possibilities of neutralizing or eliminating acids have been exhausted.

So unless the treatment actually removes acids from the body and replaces nutrient building blocks, the cure at best will be only temporary and a cover-up Band-Aid therapy, shoving the disease deeper into a chronic state. Remember, there is not one drug on the market that reduces the acidity of the body or addresses any kind of nutritional deficiency. The sobering fact is, almost all drugs are acidic, especially antibiotics, and add to the acid residues. And if the drugs were successful at removing acids from an infected area, the acid would migrate to some other weak tissue in the body that will create side effects there, unless the treatment involves the disposal of acids from all body organs. For this reason, today’s medical science is pathetic when it comes to the cure for degenerative and metabolic disease.

Cancer Cell Growth Is Caused By Acid:

Let's look at cancer. If you were to ask an allopathic doctor to explain cancer in a few words, the best that they can come up with after all these years of research is a cell mutation, a missing gene, or maybe a virus causing immuno-suppression. Since cancer is not a localized disease, but a systemic condition, it shows up in the body’s weakest link(s). I refer to the body’s weakest links as the dead zones because they carry a declining electromagnetic charge. All healthy cells carry an electromagnetic negative charge, but all fermented cells and their acids carry an electromagnetic positive charge.

These rotting cells and their acids act like a glue (attracting each other) because opposites attract, causing healthy cells to stick together. This leads to oxygen deprivation where healthy cells begin to rot. This is cancer. It’s my conclusion based on years of research and study that cancer and AIDS are nothing more or less than a cellular disturbance of the electromagnetic balance due to acid PH disorganization of the cellular microzymas, their morbid evolution to bacteria, yeast fungus and molds, and their production of exotoxins and mycotoxins. Cancer therefore is a four-letter word — ACID, especially lactic acid as a waste product due to the low oxygen level and waste products of yeast and fungus.

Dr. Otto Warburg, two time Nobel Prize winner, stated in his book, The Metabolism of Tumors. that the primary cause of cancer was the replacement of oxygen in the respiratory cell chemistry by the fermentation of sugar. The growth of cancer cells is initiated by a fermentation process, which can be triggered only in the absence of oxygen at the cell level. Just like over*worked muscle cells manufacture lactic acid by-products as waste, cancerous cells spill lactic acid and other acidic compounds causing acid pH.

If you cover your mouth, oxygen is cut off and carbon dioxide is built up as an acid waste and you will eventually pass out through asphyxiation. And if your body’s blood pH goes below seven, oxygen is cut off and you will be put into a coma or death will occur. The blood performs a balancing act in order to maintain the blood pH within a safe range of 7.35 - 7.45. Some cells instead of dying as normal cells do in an acid environment may adapt and survive by becoming abnormal cells like primitive yeast cells. These abnormal primitive yeast cells are called malignant cells. Malignant renegade cells do not communicate with brain function, or with their own DNA memory code. Therefore, malignant cells grow indefinitely and without order. This biological disorder is what science calls cancer This could be improved by an alkaline diet and boosting the immune system.

The Rivalry: 

During their lifetimes, the rivalry between Bechamp and Pasteur was constant, and often bitter. They clashed frequently both in speeches before the Academy, and in papers presented to it. Bechamp repeatedly showed that Pasteur’s ‘findings’ included frequent plagiarizations (and distortions) of Bechamp’s own work.

When Bechamp and others objected to the plagiarization, Pasteur set out to use his political clout to destroy Bechamp’s career and reputation. Unfortunately, Pasteur largely succeeded. He was more skilful than Bechamp at playing politics and attending the right functions. He was good at making friends in high circles, and was popular with the royal family. Pasteur, in other words, was an A-lister. Bechamp was a worker.

The ideas, as well as the characters, of the two men were fundamentally opposed.

Pasteur argued for what we now call the ‘germ theory’ of disease, while Bechamp’s work sought to confirm pleomorphism; the idea that all life is based on the forms that a certain class of organisms take during the various stages of their life-cycles.

This difference is fundamental. Bechamp believed that his work showed the connection between science and religion – the one a search after truth, and the other the effort to live up to individual belief. It is fitting that his book Les Mycrozymas culminates in the acclamation of God as the Supreme Source. Bechamp’s teachings are in direct opposition to the materialistic views of the modern science of the twentieth century.

“These microorganisms (germs) feed upon the poisonous material which they find in the sick organism and prepare it for excretion. These tiny organisms are derived from still tinier organisms called microzyma. These microzyma are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms where they remain normally quiescent and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation takes place. The microzyma changes into a bacterium or virus which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the microzyma stage”

– Antoine Bechamp

Antoine Bechamp was able to scientifically prove that germs are the chemical-byproducts and constituents of pleomorphic microorganisms enacting upon the unbalanced, malfunctioning cell metabolism and dead tissue that actually produces dis-ease. Bechamp found that the diseased, acidic, low-oxygen cellular environment is created by a toxic/nutrient deficient diet, toxic emotions, and a toxic lifestyle. His findings demonstrate how cancer develops through the morbid changes of germs to bacteria, bacteria to viruses, viruses to fungal forms, and fungal forms to cancer cells. He found microzymas present in every cell in the bloodstream, in animals, in plants, and even in rocks. He found them present in the remains of dead animals many years after the animal's body had withered away to dust. He observed that in a healthy organism, microzymas work at repairing and nourishing all cells; but when the terrain becomes acidic, the microzymas morph into viruses, bacteria, yeast, fungus, and mold and prepare to break the host down.

I AM GOD ☆ Я ЕСМЬ БОГ

 / / / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

I AM GOD

I am that I am, whom I will become. Ya, Я is the last 33rd letter of Russian alphabet means 'I am'. I am the one and only true God, there is no other gods but me. Thy shalt worship only me. God, the emanation of the Source as love, truth, and peace, does not change. Changing is for the world of mortals, the creation not the creator. I am followed by an adjective or a name is circumstantial attribute that can change, a subject, of unchanging I am that has no name nor definition of any kind. 

A human is born with the sense of self being developed first before any other recognition. Not that the self is not present yet and needs time to evolve, the living body is already the self however not conscious of the fact however very much aware of it on the subconscious level. So it is only a matter of making the connection and voila the awareness of the self becomes apparent. However, at this stage it is the separated from the rest idea of the self. Now the Consciousness starts to make connections between the self and others, nature and the world at large. 

At first it connects its self with that of the parents, family members, friends, community, people with similar interests and tastes, sexual connections, personal and business relations, local village or town, region, county, ethnicity and nationality, religious affiliations, political positions, socioeconomic status etc. until the unification process starts to include the notions of higher Self that is all encompassing and embracing with the evolution of so called Christ Consciousness. 

At this point the lower self awareness that deals with the boundaries and separation, survival through competition and procreation, animal instincts of attack, flee, or hide gets sidelined by much more powerful higher Self awareness which if necessary can sacrifice the lower self for that sake of higher ideals, principles, innocence, justice, love, truth, peace etc. 

The power of inner Christ. It has more to do with the development of Consciousness than the journey of the sun throughout the year across different stages and stations signaling what needs to be done and what to expect. Yes, astrotheology of ancient cultures was very important for the survival of agricultural societies however the story of the higher Self is crucial for the wellbeing of the soul in its eternal existence which continues in the afterlife, beyond death.

One has to connect their notions of the self that is separated from everyone and everything else with the Higher Self that is  at the core of all existence. The eternal unchanging ethereal mind of God shalt replace the shallow temporal changing matterial ego mind, that is limited by a mortal idea of who one is, with that of knowing who one truly is and destined to become. Everything is changing, evolving, developing around the unchanging centre of oneself where the soul as awaken higher Self reigns Supreme. 

In the world of dichotomies it takes the two to tango, if something is changing then something must remain the same. The thing that remains the same is our sense of peace, our sense of truth, and our sense of love. While the notions of these universal constants can change in their definitions and meaning their sense and nature remains unchanged. And it is in contrast with this axle of stability that the change around it can be experienced and perceived by also unchanging Self. For the lower self can change and does, must even, but the higher Self remains ever the same, unchanged, and undisturbed.

The day of rest is thus dedicated to the higher Self so that the lower self can get some time off from survival concerns to make this connection between lower and higher Self awareness, thus saving the soul from the need of reincarnation and seemingly eternal hells after death if one dies without becoming enlightened, in their ignorance. 

The word buddha means being awake to this fact. That is why in his first sutra Siddhartha Gautama was teaching about the concept of dukkah as root cause of all disturbance, inaccurately translated as suffering, as in "life is suffering", however that is wrong lopsided interpretation. In reality it is a metaphor of a wheel where the properly balanced, good, wheel is called sukkah while bad wheel where axle is off centre is called dukkah because it provides for uncomfortable bumpy ride. 

The farther away one is from their Self centre the more there is Chaos and change, the more change the slower the perception of time, while the closer one is to their spiritual centre the more there is order and stability, less change and thus faster perception of time. At the very centre are the universal constants of eternal love, truth, and peace that do not change and are three aspects of one unity and unified force around which the notions of Self are anchored and the Chaos is organized into order. 

It is here at the centre of the Source where first dichotomy takes place, i.e. turning madness of constant change into Cosmos of unchanging constants from where the first archetypes arise as eternal love, truth, and peace. The three jewels that make up the soul endowed with the freedom to choose it's own destiny. While in life all roads lead to Rome, in Europe literally, however in death all roads lead to peace where the souls can rest forever and ever. Amen 

"To be one who is is not to be someone else." "The universe has its centre everywhere and its circumference nowhere."

RUSSIAN 

Я ЕСМЬ БОГ 

Я есмь то, что я есмь, кем я стану. Я, Я – последняя 33-я буква русского алфавита, означающая «Я есмь». Я – единственный истинный Бог, нет других богов, кроме меня. Только мне да поклоняются. Бог, эманация Источника как любви, истины и мира, неизменен. Изменчивость свойственна миру смертных, творению, а не творцу. За «Я» следует прилагательное или имя – обстоятельное определение, которое может изменяться, подлежащее неизменного «Я есмь», не имеющего ни имени, ни определения.

Человек рождается с чувством собственного «я», которое развивается прежде любого другого осознания. Это не значит, что «я» ещё не существует и ему требуется время для развития; живое тело уже является «я», пусть и не осознаёт этого, но очень хорошо осознаёт это на подсознательном уровне. Поэтому достаточно лишь установить связь, и вуаля – осознание «я» становится очевидным. Однако на этом этапе это отделённое от остального представление о себе. Теперь Сознание начинает устанавливать связи между собой и другими, природой и миром в целом.

Сначала он соединяет себя с родителями, членами семьи, друзьями, сообществом, людьми со схожими интересами и вкусами, сексуальными связями, личными и деловыми отношениями, местной деревней или городом, регионом, графством, этнической принадлежностью и национальностью, религиозной принадлежностью, политическими позициями, социально-экономическим статусом и т. д., пока процесс объединения не начнет включать в себя понятия высшего Я, которое всеохватывает и охватывает эволюцию так называемого Сознания Христа.

В этот момент низшее самосознание, которое имеет дело с границами и разделением, выживанием посредством конкуренции и продолжения рода, животными инстинктами нападения, бегства или прятанья, отступает на второй план перед гораздо более сильным высшим самосознанием, которое при необходимости может пожертвовать низшим я ради высших идеалов, принципов, невинности, справедливости, любви, истины, мира и т. д.

Сила внутреннего Христа. Она связана скорее с развитием Сознания, чем с годовым путешествием Солнца через различные фазы и стоянки, сигнализируя о том, что нужно делать и чего ожидать. Да, астротеология древних культур была очень важна для выживания аграрных обществ, однако история высшего «Я» имеет решающее значение для благополучия души в её вечном существовании, которое продолжается в загробной жизни, после смерти.

Необходимо связать свои представления о себе, отделенном от всех и всего, с Высшим Я, лежащей в основе всего сущего. Вечный, неизменный, эфирный разум Бога заменит поверхностный, временный, изменчивый, материальный разум эго, ограниченный смертным представлением о себе, на знание того, кем ты являешься на самом деле и кем тебе суждено стать. Всё меняется, развивается, развивается вокруг неизменного центра личности, где душа, как пробужденное высшее Я, правит верховенством.

В мире дихотомий для танго нужны двое: если что-то меняется, то что-то должно оставаться прежним. Неизменным остаётся наше чувство покоя, наше чувство истины и наше чувство любви. Хотя понятия этих универсальных констант могут меняться в своих определениях и значениях, их смысл и природа остаются неизменными. И именно в отличие от этой оси стабильности, изменения вокруг неё могут ощущаться и восприниматься также неизменным «Я». Ибо низшее «Я» может меняться и меняется, даже должно, но высшее «Я» остаётся всегда тем же, неизменным и невозмутимым.

Таким образом, день отдыха посвящается высшему «Я», чтобы низшее «я» могло немного отдохнуть от забот о выживании и установить связь между осознанием низшего и высшего «Я», тем самым избавляя душу от необходимости реинкарнации и кажущегося вечного ада после смерти, если человек умрет, не достигнув просветления, в своем невежестве.

Слово «будда» означает «осознание этого факта». Именно поэтому в своей первой сутре Сиддхартха Гаутама учил о концепции дукки как коренной причине всех беспокойств, что неверно переводится как страдание, например, «жизнь есть страдание», однако это неверное, однобокое толкование. На самом деле, это метафора колеса: правильно сбалансированное, хорошее колесо называется суккой, а плохое колесо, ось которого смещена от центра, называется дуккой, поскольку это создаёт дискомфорт при езде по ухабам.

Чем дальше человек от своего центра, тем больше хаоса и перемен, чем больше перемен, тем медленнее восприятие времени. В то же время, чем ближе человек к своему духовному центру, тем больше порядка и стабильности, меньше перемен и, следовательно, быстрее восприятие времени. В самом центре находятся универсальные константы вечной любви, истины и мира, которые неизменны и представляют собой три аспекта единого единства и единой силы, вокруг которых зиждутся представления о «Я», а Хаос организуется в порядок.

Именно здесь, в центре Источника, происходит первая дихотомия: безумие постоянных изменений превращается в Космос неизменных констант, откуда возникают первые архетипы: вечная любовь, истина и мир. Три драгоценности, составляющие душу, наделённую свободой выбирать свою судьбу. При жизни все дороги ведут в Рим, в Европу – буквально, но после смерти все дороги ведут к миру, где души обретают вечный покой. Аминь. «Быть ​​тем, кто есть, – значит не быть кем-то другим». «У вселенной центр повсюду, а окружность нигде».

Верховный Священник всея Мира Александр I

    ♡

_\\|//_

Р У С Ь

/ / / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

³ "По Ра Вило Словие ХристиЯнИн (Christ Yin Yang) это в сути человек который находится в возвышенном духовным сознание и в себе олицетворяет союз противоположностей, чья душа спасена через раскаяние а не жертвоприношения. А что щас называют Христианство это же Римская Полинская херня.

Да дугавая развилочка с кругом по середине на попраховых плитах древних славянин так и есть же основа тарот карты шута, номер ноль, что по старой традиции называется по Русски тара и обозначает нить жизни, судьбы, и предков в форме прялки, сохраняя таким образом старославянинскую мудрость о чем многочисленные так называемые иконы и проповедают являясь символами этапам развития сознания в духовной истине миротворения как и соотношения дней года с соответствующими праздниками определённых по ходу солнца, равноденствия и солнцестояния, расположение которого вычисляли с помощью трёх зубной вилки коли то и есть кий от чего и происходит так называемая Киевская Русь. 

Раскрыта тайна "вилочкого креста"! О чём молчат историки... ЮТуб канал Исторический Вольнодумец, Михаил

https://youtu.be/j8Ke9Lh7YjY?si=BOW75kPQ64LVGdSY

Руси старой иконостас вот и есть календарь по которому вычисляли важные даты, например когда сеять, когда жнать, когда реки как Нева, Днепр, и Волга освобождались от льда начиная этим навигацию и торговлю. Тоже представляется в нём десять дней в неделе/деле, двенадцать месяцев в году, тринадцать созвездей включая змеяносца, и тридцать три богатыря Русской азбуки из которой потом зделали в сокращённом виде тарот.

Посмотрите В. Куланов - Скрытауа История Руси @Kulanov_Vyacheslav

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzpcpiJKcQlaFG85jI8gBt2mRuReamtBf&si=TZQlCDla0gvdJeJi

"Ремейки" старых Богов. Зачем придумали Неоязычество? Михаил канал ЮТуб Исторический Вольнодумец

https://youtu.be/RceBd4HxnEI?si=obuB-RqHYQxQDjYT